Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)H
Posts
5261
Comments
1529
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • That's indeed bad, but wait until you hear about the sick leave rules in other regions outside Europe and democratic allies, particularly in those that celebrate themselves as 'socialist' or 'communist'.

  • A quick remainder that this is not only limited to the EU.

    Among the larger economies, China has been increasing its business ties to Israel significantly. Bilateral Israel/China trade rebounded since 2023 and in 2025 reached a record high (including Hong Kong).

    China benefits more than Israel, as the growth is heavily asymmetric. While Israeli imports from China rose by 25 percent between 2023-2025 to more than USD 16 billion in 2025, Israeli exports to China plummeted by 40 percent to less than USD 3 billion, resulting a huge trade surplus for China.

    China is the biggest exporter to Israel with some 25% of Israeli imports coming from China, more than double the US volume. So China makes good money in Israel, too.

    In addition, Chinese companies continue to participate in the construction of huge projects critical to the Israeli economy.

  • A quick remainder that this is not only limited to the EU.

    Among the larger economies, China has been increasing its business ties to Israel significantly. Bilateral Israel/China trade rebounded since 2023 and in 2025 reached a record high (including Hong Kong).

    China benefits more than Israel, as the growth is heavily asymmetric. While Israeli imports from China rose by 25 percent between 2023-2025 to more than USD 16 billion in 2025, Israeli exports to China plummeted by 40 percent to less than USD 3 billion, resulting a huge trade surplus for China.

    China is the biggest exporter to Israel with some 25% of Israeli imports coming from China, more than double the US volume. So China makes good money in Israel, too.

    In addition, Chinese companies continue to participate in the construction of huge projects critical to the Israeli economy.

  • I didn't mean to call you out. What I wanted to say is that although the system may be imperfect, it is better than in dictatorial regimes celebrated by Novara Media.

    This is a textbook example of selection bias by a propaganda medium. They single out 1 measure out of 34, publish "the West bad" tonality, and then hail autocratic systems like the one in China as the solution, although the welfare system and labour rights there are catastrophically worse. This is an essential part of disinformation warfare.

  • Tim Cook has surrendered Apple to China long time ago. More than 80% of iPhone are still made in China, even though Cook was trying to move production to India in the recent couple of years. It's essentially a Chinese company dependent on the regime's decision. If they want Apple to buy in China, they need to buy in China.

  • Tim Cook has surrendered Apple to China long time ago. More than 80% of iPhone are still made in China, even though Cook was trying to move production to India in the recent couple of years. It's essentially a Chinese company dependent on the regime's decision. If they want Apple to buy in China, they need to buy in China.

  • They need to fire the dumb fuck who made the rule, but I’m not sure what system they use there and how long they’re stuck with him.

    'They' use a democratic system which means that usually they are stuck with the "dumbfuck" until the next election. Very much unlike in dictatorships where they are stuck with the "dumbfuck" for much longer while any critique similar to what we read here would be harshly punished as 'they' have no say.

  • There is a community here on Lemmy that tries to normalize biased media that favour China and other autocratic systems.

    I don't support this German move, but in addition to the end to phone-based sick notes, the German government introduced another 33 measures, including a €10 billion in income tax relief targeted at lower and middle-income earners. But Novara Media takes a single measure out of 34. This is a textbook case of selection bias.

    There is nothing wrong with critique, but there are good sources that explain the entire German package in more depth, and many of them are easier accessible as they aren't hiding behind Cloudflare as Novara Media does if I may say so.

  • This is bad, but Novara Media is using such news while at the same time hailing China for its policies, although Chinese social welfare and labour conditions are far behind Germany's or anywhere else in Western democracies. This is a highly biased anti-democratic medium in my opinion.

  • The West has long called on China to stop supporting Russia.

  • China, the EU, and many (not all) countries and regions planned to reach its peak, but it is not enough. This is one part the linked report says.

    Again, China is among the countries most behind. I provided all the links. What you are doing is repeating the same propaganda over and again. If you don't come up with something related to reality, I end this conversation.

  • The country is also behind its fair share contribution. Even the Chinese government admits this.

    It helps if you read the linked article instead of repeating always the same propaganda narratives. Such a conversation is waste of time.

  • China is behind also in its 'fair share' contribution. Such arguments are what China's propaganda outlets spread all the time, but it is not true.

  • You are simply wrong, and you don't appear to read the articles.

    The numbers are fine, and to a large part they even come from the Chinese government.

    Coal should “play an important underpinning and balancing role” in China for years to come, China's National Development and Reform Commission said a year ago.

    One result of this is that coal power development is becoming more geographically concentrated: In 2018, the top ten countries accounted for 83% of global coal capacity under development; by 2025, that share had risen to 97%. China and India alone comprise nearly 90% of coal power developments..

    In 2025, China's new coal power installations reach 18-year high.

    It’s 15th five-year plan says that China’s goals for non-fossil energy additions would see the country’s annual green energy additions fall by more than half compared to the 14th five-year plan. At the same time, fossil fuel energy consumption will increase by 8-10%. This will reverse the development in the last five years.

    No country is on track to reach its climate goals, but China is among the worst in the long-term.

    This is a simple fact, and the linked article explains this and the entire propaganda around the issue in more depth.

  • The numbers and the way how they are presented are fine, there's nothing weird.

    It's 15th five-year plan says that China’s goals for non-fossil energy additions would see the country’s annual green energy additions fall by more than half compared to the 14th five-year plan. At the same time, fossil fuel energy consumption will increase by 8-10%.

  • China does not increase fossil fuels as your own link reads, amongst others,

    China is also the world’s largest coal mine methane (CMM) emitter, accounting for 76% of global CMM emissions in 2023. Despite this, independent estimates suggest actual emissions may be higher than officially reported figures.

    (But the headline is promising, unfortunately also highly misleading.)

    I wrote in another thread already that China's emissions rose this century from less then 4 billion tons to more than 13 billions.

    What makes the situation worse is that emissions in China are set to rise: Even the Chinese Communist Party's 15th five-year plan says that China’s goals for non-fossil energy additions would see China’s annual green energy additions fall by more than half compared to the 14th five-year plan. At the same time, fossil fuel energy consumption will increase by 8-10%.

    Here you can see the countries and their contributions to climate change (hint: China, together with Russia, ranks among the worst).

  • Honestly, if this were a report not on China but, say, on Europe, the US or Australia, would you say the same? Would you say that 'they care' and 'are tackling it'?

    From the report:

    Given that Chinese authorities often censor information, restrict independent investigations, fail to comprehensively document or publicly disclose child labor data, and punish people for reporting problems, the true magnitude of these violations may be considerably greater.

  • Pope ‘Cannot Comment’ On Jimmy Lai’s Imprisonment [March 2026]

    Pope Leo XIV [said] he “cannot comment” on Jimmy Lai, the Catholic founder and publisher of the outspoken pro-democracy tabloid Apple Daily, who was sentenced Feb. 9 [...] to 20 years in prison [under China's 'national security law] a case his supporters have denounced as a politically driven show trial.

    Pope names Chinese bishop as he keeps historic Vatican-Beijing accord [June 2025]

    The agreement gave Chinese officials some input on the appointment of bishops. However, its contents were never fully disclosed to the public. Beijing insists that the state must approve the appointment of bishops in China, running contrary to the Catholic Church's insistence that it is a papal decision. China has some 10 million Catholics.

    These are just two examples of 'double standard' by this person.

  • Yeah, China has a long tradition in 'supporting' Sudan and its government (Sudan was the first African country to recognize the People's Republic of China in 1959). In the 2000s Beijing even sent weapons during the Darfur crisis, as one report back then says (opens pdf):

    The genocide in Darfur is not an unknown problem to those in power in China. However, it is clear the Chinese government will do whatever it takes to support and maintain China’s economic growth. Because the Chinese government is focused on this one goal, it is more willing to turn a blind eye to corruption and oppression within the Sudanese regime.