Because it wasn’t his role, and he still is a murderer

If the situation was the same, but the killer didn’t know the person he killed did all that, would you believe the same? Does intent really change anything? Else, some crimes could go unpunished

And "indirectly" can be stretched far. Employer not paying enough, lawmakers enabling this, food makers putting dangerous additives in food

Should we also kill hotel managers that put expensive rooms, so homeless or poor people can’t buy them, have to sleep outside, and could die from it?

Same for flat and house owners. Putting an expensive rent, therefore lowering the money of the person living inside, and not allowing them to afford proper medical care would be considered indirectly killing, and the owner should be killed?

It has huge implications, and we all have a role in it