Transnational Repression on Canadian Campuses: An Emerging Disinformation Threat
Transnational Repression on Canadian Campuses: An Emerging Disinformation Threat
Transnational Repression on Canadian Campuses: An Emerging Disinformation Threat
Transnational repression on Canadian campuses is an emerging threat distorting information environments and exposing NATO vulnerabilities. Using a two‑tier framework, Ji Young Kim shows how foreign co...
cross-posted from: https://scribe.disroot.org/post/10489933
Transnational repression on Canadian campuses is an emerging epistemic threat that distorts Canada’s information environment and undermines Canadian sovereignty and NATO security efforts. Transnational repression occurs when foreign governments silence, intimidate, or control individuals in Canada, threatening the freedom of expression of students and faculty.
On Canadian campuses, transnational repression functions as a disinformation and epistemic threat because it interferes with the very processes through which knowledge is produced, shaping which perspectives are expressed, recorded, and treated as representative. Instead of injecting fake news into campuses, foreign states can suppress dissenting views that conflict with their interests, narrowing the range of permissible viewpoints and manufacturing a false sense of reality and consensus.
...
Canada, in particular, is especially vulnerable because of its decentralized governance, highly internationalized campuses, and liberal pluralist system — a system designed to protect diverse cultural, ethnic, and political identities — which creates pockets for foreign actors to exploit and distort its information ecosystem. While transnational repression has existed as a hybrid threat for centuries, what makes it so volatile today is the scale, speed, and technology at which it is carried out.
...
In September 2020, amidst the shift to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, the UBC administration formally requested that instructors place warning labels on course syllabi. The recommended text warned students to avoid course materials covering topics that could be considered illegal or censored by non-Canadian governments. While UBC framed the warnings as a measure to protect their students, critics argued that it fundamentally shifted the burden of safety. Instead of the institution actively securing digital privacy or pushing back against foreign authoritarian reach, they shifted the responsibility of safety onto vulnerable students, telling them to simply “exercise caution” or self-censor by avoiding courses entirely.
Despite good intentions, the practice was harmful as students were constrained from creating and contributing to new knowledge — the very purpose post-secondary institutions ought to serve. Chinese students vulnerableArchived link to the influence of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) regime face targeted threats, family pressure, and digital surveillance amplified by platforms like WeChat, as they are often the only way for students to reach family behind the Great Firewall, allowing the state to reinforce those pressures by tracking communications live and distributing propaganda into students’ primary and personal information sources. By using such tactics of disinformation to force self‑censorship, the PRC effectively deleted critical perspectives from Canadian institutions. This resulting chilling effect creates a false impression of consensus or indifference to current human rights issues affecting individuals in Canada.
...