It's very funny that the article goes out of it's way to say like, "The West never does things like this" because it means y'all don't get to accuse me of "whataboutism."

This motherfucker using a whataboutism to explain how HIS whataboutism is immune from being pointed out 🙄🤦🏻

The US literally asserts the jurisdiction to bomb any country on earth if a secret, unelected, totally unaccountable domestic court determinines the country is harboring "terrorists," a nebulus term which has now been expanded to mean anyone who doesn't like fascism or doesn't buy things from Israel. "Every western example rests on a defined wrong" is an absolutely insane sentence to write.

Absolutely correct.

Still doesn't make the Chinese law just.

to promote ethnic divisions to create dissent and instability.

You know who worry about "dissent and instability" enough to make laws specifically against it?

Tyrants and nobody else.

Do you know which people applaud such laws in spite of not being amongst the powerful people they're designed to protect?

Tankies, fascists, and other idiots prone to cheer their own oppression. Nobody else.