solo

Ρε θενξ για το ποστ. Είναι θεματολογίες που μ'ενδιαφέρουν, αλλά δεν ήξερα τις εξελίξεις. (Έχω μπλέξει τελευταία με δουλειά, σε σημείο που τώρα το είδα το άρθρο, μια βδομάδα μετά...)

I see things differently. Maybe (just maybe) industrializing data collection does not affect my way of living, and maybe, as you say, we got better maps out of this.

Still, I do care about other people, those that are directly affected by these technologies. Especially because of their military use. I believe it's important to care about others as well.

Btw and since you won't watch this, if you feel like, check out the company called Niantic.

Thank you for mentioning this. I wanted to write something similar in the description and totally forgot

There's a link at the very top of the article, if you click on it, you will get another article and there you can find many links that take you to the relevant studies

Απ' ότι φαίνεται έχω χάσει επεισόδια. Άρθρο από το δικαστικό πρακτορείο ειδήσεων Δεκ 2024:

Marfin 14 χρόνια μετά – Απόφαση “φωτιά” από τον Άρειο Πάγο: Καταλογίζει ευθύνες στην τράπεζα για έλλειψη μέτρων ασφαλείας

Μισό λεπτό ρε παιδιά. Η τράπεζα δεν είχε έξοδο κινδύνου. Παρ' όλ' αυτά λειτουργούσε. Κάτι τέτοιο δε μου φαίνεται νόμιμο. Έχουν πάει δικαστήρια κάποιον απ' τη τράπεζα ή από αυτούς που δίνουν τις άδειες λειτουργίας?

Your framing makes it seem like earlier feminists realized their errs and opened up

I really don't know where you got that impression. I specifically talk about feminism, so that the focus is on an intergenerational time-frame.

My point is that it’s the achievement of intersectionalism, not of feminism

I am not familiar with the term intersectionalism. I know that intersectionality started as a term for legal analysis coined by Kimberlé Crenshaw and then was adopted by feminists because it created a helpful analytical framework.

A few more words to clarify a couple of stuff.

The way I see things, the current wave of feminism is using the analytical tool of intersectionality which allows mistakes of the past to be addressed and not to be repeated.

Last time I checked, I also concluded that terfs are still a thing. For me, there is nothing radical in being a transphobe, so I think we should just call them that: transphobes. They can call themselves feminists, the word is out there for anyone to use. And this is why every time someone tells me they are a feminist I ask them and/or try to see how they see intersectionality so I know to who I am talking (if they are westerners, that is). And I hope by now it is clear, I don't go into conversations defending the purity of movements.

Personnally, I do not reproduce quotes that haven't age well. The OP, you and everyone do as you want. I am not quote- police or something.

I find it weird you mention the 'no true Scotsman" fallacy for TERFs. The acronym means Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist.

This is in part the older, gender neutral usage of “man” meaning “human” and in part ignorance about woman issues.

Sure, in good faith we need to take into account the historical background. Still, the quote "If you're a man, you take it" in 2026, sounds more like something coming from the manosphere.

There were black women who felt left out both from black liberation movements and from feminism.

This is why feminism evovled to be intersectional.

OP, why do you believe this Nick Shirley person? Everything he has done so far has been debunked through fact-checking.

Με βάση το άρθρο 145 του ν. 4472/2017, μέχρι τώρα ίσχυε:

Αρχιεπίσκοπος δύο χιλιάδες εξακόσια (2.600) ευρώ.
Μητροπολίτης και Τιτουλάριος Μητροπολίτης δύο χιλιάδες διακόσια δέκα (2.210) ευρώ.
Τιτουλάριος Επίσκοπος και Βοηθός Επίσκοπος χίλια οκτακόσια είκοσι (1.820) ευρώ.

Σχετικό:

The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP7 (ScenarioMIP-CMIP7)

Abstract

Scenarios serve as a critical tool in climate change analysis, enabling the exploration of future evolution of the climate system, climate impacts, and the human system (including mitigation and adaptation actions). This paper describes the scenario framework for ScenarioMIP as part of CMIP7. The design process has involved various rounds of interaction with the research community and user groups at large. The proposal covers a set of scenarios exploring high levels of climate change (to explore high-end climate risks), medium levels of climate change (anchored to current policy), and low levels of climate change (aligned with current international agreements). These scenarios follow very different trajectories in terms of emissions, with some likely to experience peaks and subsequent declines in greenhouse gas concentrations in this century. An important innovation is that most scenarios are intended to be run, if possible, in emission-driven mode, providing a better representation of the Earth system uncertainty space. The proposal also includes plans for long-term extensions (up to 2500 AD) to study long-term impacts, climate change-related processes on long timescales, and (ir)reversibility. This proposal forms the basis for further implementation of the framework in terms of the derivation of emissions and land use pathways for use by Earth system models and additional variants for adaptation and mitigation studies.

Introduction

Scenarios serve as a critical tool in climate change analysis. Defined as plausible alternative descriptions of how the future may develop based on a coherent set of assumptions, they are used by different research communities to explore potential future avenues of socio-economic conditions, assess the effects of different drivers of climate change, characterize future climatic conditions, and assess impacts of climate change as well as adaptation and mitigation responses. As such, scenarios are also useful to bridge across different research communities. The World Climate Research Programme's (WCRP) Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) has organized several rounds of the development and use of such scenarios. The CMIP scenarios play not only a pivotal role in climate research but also act as integrating tools for scientific assessment processes and policy analysis. In the most recent phase 6 (CMIP6), CMIP delegated the organization of experiments targeting specific research areas and questions to the scientific community, and CMIP6-Endorsed Model Intercomparison Projects were established (Eyring et al., 2016). The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) formed a primary activity within CMIP6 that facilitated multi-model climate projections based on alternative plausible forcing scenarios that are directly relevant to societal concerns regarding climate change mitigation, adaptation, and future climate impacts and risks1 (O'Neill et al., 2016; Tebaldi et al., 2021).

In this continuing role, ScenarioMIP's goal for CMIP7 is the design of a limited set of scenario-based experiments to be run by climate models, that (1) serve direct science questions, (2) function as input to other (science) communities and (3) support policy. With regard to the direct science contribution, the scenario information is used to study and understand climate processes and how their response to anthropogenic forcings emerges from internal variability and model structural uncertainties. To accomplish this aim, it is important that the set of forcing variables considered is internally consistent and varies over a plausible range of forcing levels, and that the set explores futures that may result in very different climate process dynamics (such as increasing and declining concentrations). With regard to the contribution to other (science) communities, ScenarioMIP ensures that data becomes available about future changes in climate variables (such as temperature, precipitation, humidity, etc.) together with information on human forcings/drivers (such as population, economic activity, land use, etc.) to a diverse set of user communities beyond the physical climate sciences. This aim is to facilitate further understanding of climate change, its impacts, risks and response options, including adaptation and mitigation choices. Targeted communities include, for instance, researchers on impacts and mitigation, but also practitioners, who might use this information for national or sub-national or local risk assessment, climate finance, mitigation policy or adaptation planning. Finally, regarding policy, ScenarioMIP aims to provide relevant outputs to support climate policy development, including through their use in IPCC assessments. Despite these important roles, climate modeling groups participating in ScenarioMIP can only run a limited set of scenarios. Computational expenses associated with setting up, running and archiving output from climate model experiments pose strict constraints on the number of scenarios that ScenarioMIP's protocol can include. Therefore, a small set of scenarios needs to be selected such that the set satisfies the three critical goals but does not require resources that are beyond reach for current scientific and computational capacity. [...]

Discussion and Conclusions

We have proposed a limited set of scenarios that, modeled by IAMs, would provide pathways of emissions, concentrations, and land use for use as external forcings for ESMs participating in CMIP7. These scenarios with their climate system outcomes are intended to facilitate studies of climate processes; provide inputs to a wide range of studies of impacts, adaptation, and mitigation; and support climate policy development and communication. They cover a wide range of plausible outcomes, from a High scenario representing policy failure and strong drivers of greenhouse gas emissions, to a Very Low scenario with dramatic emissions reductions.

The implementation of these scenarios in IAMs and ESMs poses a number of challenges, not all of which can be addressed or fully explored within the ScenarioMIP process. As a result, in a number of cases it became necessary to make design choices on the basis of current literature. Throughout the article, we have indicated where further research could advance the field and summarize important directions here.Produce wider set of IAM scenarios:

Produce idealized or counterfactual emissions and land use scenarios to complement the plausible scenarios proposed here. The ScenarioMIP design is limited to scenarios judged to be plausible, but other scenarios could also provide useful insight. For example, scenarios that are higher or lower than those proposed here, or that imagine counter-factual historical outcomes (Meinshausen et al., 2024), can be of scientific interest or policy relevant. Develop alternative implementations of the scenarios requested here from the IAM community using different modeling paradigms and normative assumptions. There are a number of questions of wide interest to the scientific and policy communities that would be unlikely to imply forcing pathways different enough to substantially affect climate system outcomes, given the role of ScenarioMIP. They therefore fall outside the scope of ScenarioMIP but are worth pursuing through other means. For example, different normative bases for approaches to mitigation may lead to different regional or sectoral emissions pathways, within approximately the same global forcing pathway. Similarly, alternative socio-economic pathways such as sustainable development scenarios with rapid convergence of regional incomes and living standards are useful to pursue but, if coupled with a target of limiting warming to (for example) likely below 2 °C, would lead to similar global forcing pathways to other 2 °C scenarios. [...]

Τέλεια! Καλύτερα να μην πάει κανείς.

Κ αν κάποιος θέλει, να περάσει από ψυχολογικό τεστ όπως κάνουν σε διάφορες χώρες (πχ Ολλανδία). Μάλλον "δε πας καλά αγόρι μου που θες να πας να σκοτώνεις ανθρώπους".

Οι αντιδράσεις των επιστημόνων είναι πρωτοφανείς. «Δεν έχουμε ξαναδεί κάτι τέτοιο στις προστατευόμενες περιοχές της Αλβανίας»

Στην ευρωπαϊκή ένωση πάντως, μια χαρά καταπατούνται οι περιοχές natura2000, κ ας είναι προστατευόμενες. πχ

The purpose of this study is not therefore to sabotage the development and integration of wind energy facilities in NATURA 2000 sites but [...]

Εθελοντική στράτευση των αντρών πότε με το καλό?

I'm sorry but this video is distoring the term epigenetics. Epigenetics is not a something that started happening in our era, it was simply something that was discovered recently.

Epigenetics is the study of changes in gene expression that occur without altering the DNA sequence. [...] Epigenetics usually involves changes that persist through cell division, and affect the regulation of gene expression. Such effects on cellular and physiological traits may result from environmental factors, or be part of normal development. [wiki]

Wenders said the film would be withdrawn from "all current forms of distribution and exhibition", meaning "streaming services, television broadcasters and distribution partners will be instructed to cease public access to the film".

Wenders said he would seek a "broad dialogue" with film institutions and groups, and only after reaching "a mutually agreed solution, which will include Nastassja Kinski, will we make the film available again".

I really liked Sorry to bother you. Can't wait to see this one!