Skip Navigation

User banner

The Nexus of Privacy

@ thenexusofprivacy @lemmy.sdf.org

Posts
87
Comments
62
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Hawley Negotiates Inclusion of STOP CSAM Act in Senate NDAA - Josh Hawley

    Jump

  • US Senator moves to file Section 230 repeal

    Jump

  • Yeah, he's expected to co-sponsor a bill with Lindsay Graham (R-SC). Bipartisan opposition to our civil liberties, sigh.

  • A leading kids safety bill has been poison pilled, supporters say

    Jump

  • It's alkways hard to know whether or not to believe them, but the article quotes Gus Bilirakis (R-FL), sponsor of the House version of KOSA, as saying that as far as he was aware, the bills would not be included in the year-end defense bill and that markup wouldn't happen til next year. Encouraging if true!

  • KOSA and other Bad Internet Bills (US-specific for now) @lemmy.sdf.org
    The Nexus of Privacy @lemmy.sdf.org

    A leading kids safety bill has been poison pilled, supporters say

    www.theverge.com /policy/837123/house-energy-commerce-kids-online-safety-package-hearing
  • KOSA and other Bad Internet Bills (US-specific for now) @lemmy.sdf.org
    The Nexus of Privacy @lemmy.sdf.org

    Fight for the Future / EFF LinkedIn Live session: How Online Age Verification Threatens the Future of the Internet

    www.linkedin.com /events/7401725552673386496/

  • Congress’s Bipartisan Child Online Safety Coalition is Unraveling

    Jump

  • You're completely right that these laws won't actually protect children. Instead, they'll give the government tools for targeting LGBTQIA2S+ youth and people seeking reproductive health care, censorship, and surveillance.

    For some legislators, that's actually the goal -- one of KOSA's sponsors in the Senate (and the Heritage Foundation, which backs the bill) has explicitly talked about using it against LGBTQ people. For others, the most charitable interpretation is that the people pushing these bills have succeeded in fooling a lot of legislators into thinking that these bills will be effective -- and that the downsides that so many civil rights, LGBTQIA2S+, and reproductive rights organizations are warning about aren't real.. Also, there's a lot of pressure on Congress to do something about the predatory way that big tech companies prey on kids and teens (and everybody else too) ... so in some cases they probably know that the bills won't really make a difference, but hey, at least passing a bill is doing something.

  • KOSA and other Bad Internet Bills (US-specific for now) @lemmy.sdf.org
    The Nexus of Privacy @lemmy.sdf.org

    Congress’s Bipartisan Child Online Safety Coalition is Unraveling

    www.techpolicy.press /congresss-bipartisan-child-online-safety-coalition-is-unraveling/

  • Missouri search for VPNs quadruples as age verification laws kick in

    Jump
  • KOSA and other Bad Internet Bills (US-specific for now) @lemmy.sdf.org
    The Nexus of Privacy @lemmy.sdf.org

    Stop Online ID Checks Week of Action

    www.fightforthefuture.org /actions/stop-online-id-checks-week-of-action/
  • Technology @lemmy.world
    The Nexus of Privacy @lemmy.sdf.org

    KOSA is dead! (US)

    www.fightforthefuture.org /news/2024-08-01-kosa-is-dead-now-its-time-to-unite-to-take-on-big-tech-for-real/

  • U.S. House Vote Narrowly Allows Rampant Abuses of Warrantless Spying Authority to Continue (US focused)

    Jump

  • From the article:

    FISA 702 warrantless surveillance purports to target only foreign subjects, but in practice sweeps in a huge amount of Americans’ communications. This allows intelligence agencies to exploit a backdoor search loophole: the FBI, CIA, and NSA conduct “U.S. person queries” of FISA 702 records to deliberately pull up Americans’ private messages, all without a warrant or any court approval. This loophole has led to systemic abuse, involving thousands of improper queries each year, including those directed at protesters, campaign donors, journalists, lawmakers, and — in one case — the online dating matches of an analyst.

  • U.S. House Vote Narrowly Allows Rampant Abuses of Warrantless Spying Authority to Continue (US focused)

    Jump

  • The FBI routinely uses its authority under FISA Section 702 to get information on Americans without a warrant, ignoring the processes that are supposed to be put in place to protect people. This has nothing to do with the FISA Title III authority that was used to get information about Carter Page, no matter what you and Trump think. If you warrantless surveillance of Americans is good, then by all means you should indeed be cheering this vote -- because they extended the scope of what information they can get at without a warrant.

    If on the other hand you think civil liberties are worth protecting, then you might take a moment to stop to think that there was bipartisan support, including progressive Democrats, for introducing reforms like a warrant requirement while still keeping the ability to surveil foreign agents in place. But opinions differ, there are plenty of people in both parties who don't think civil liberties are worth protecting, so if you're one of them you've got a lot of company.

  • Trump Loyalists Kill Vote on US Wiretap Program

    Jump

  • Trump Loyalists Kill Vote on US Wiretap Program

    Jump

  • Yeah, all the scare tactics about how "oh noes national security is at risk if FISA isn't extended!!!!" are garbage; if Section 702 lapses, existing certifications are already approved for the next year, and the government has other authorities it can do the same kind of surveillance with. And the surveillance he's complaining about wasn't even under this section of FISA -- it's the Title III stuff which doesn't need to be reauthorized!

    As Howie Klein says on Down With Tyranny FISA Was Always Bad Legislation... It's Still Bad Even If Trump And MAGA Suddenly Oppose It Too

  • Trump Loyalists Kill Vote on US Wiretap Program

    Jump

  • They did -- FISA shouldn't be extended without reforms. All the scare tactics about how "oh noes national security is at risk if FISA isn't extended!!!!" are garbage; if Section 702 lapses, existing certifications are already approved for the next year, and the government has other authorities it can do the same kind of surveillance with.

    As Howie Klein says on Down With Tyranny FISA Was Always Bad Legislation... It's Still Bad Even If Trump And MAGA Suddenly Oppose It Too

  • Wolf In Sheep’s Clothing: A Planned Amendment to This Week’s Vote Would Be the Largest Expansion of FISA in Over 15 Years (US-focused)

    Jump

  • Back in December, they tried to get an even WORSE FISA extension bill through as part of the NDAA -- without even a vote on it -- and the pushback was strong enough that they abandoned the plan. In 2020 grassroots activism kept them from rauthorizing Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act . In 2015 grassroots activism kept them from doing a straight reauthorization of the PATRIOT Act. So there really is a track record of it being effective on this issue.

    The key dynamic here is that both parties are split on the issue -- progressive Dems along with Libertarian and MAGA Republicans all favor reform. So even representatives in a district that one party always wins have to consider the politics: Republicans wanting to keep their MAGA cred against MAGA challengers, Democrats facing progressive challengers (or progressive Dems who need strong support from their base against centrist challengers). Plus there are a handful of centrist Dems in purple districts who might vote the right way if it can pick up some Republican votes.

  • Microsoft endorses anti-LGBTQ online "child safety" bill KOSA night before Big Tech hearing (US Politics)

    Jump

  • Technically yes but judges get annoyed if there's absolutely no case, so they rarely do -- and if they threaten when there's no case, larger companies will look at it and say the threat's not real.

  • Microsoft endorses anti-LGBTQ online "child safety" bill KOSA night before Big Tech hearing (US Politics)

    Jump

  • The law's defintion of harm is extremely broad. Charlie Jane Anders has a good discussion of this in The Internet Is About to Get a Lot Worse:

    "This clause is so vaguely defined that attorneys general can absolutely claim that queer content violates it — and they don't even need to win these lawsuits in order to prevail. They might not even need to file a lawsuit, in fact. The mere threat of an expensive, grueling legal battle will be enough to make almost every Internet platform begin to scrub anything related to queer people."

  • Microsoft endorses anti-LGBTQ online "child safety" bill KOSA night before Big Tech hearing (US Politics)

    Jump

  • In practice, when the AG threatens to sue and the law makes it clear that they'll win (which KOSA currently does), companies will typically stop what they're doing (or settle if the AG actually launches a suit)

  • Microsoft endorses anti-LGBTQ online "child safety" bill KOSA night before Big Tech hearing (US Politics)

    Jump

  • Microsoft endorses anti-LGBTQ online "child safety" bill KOSA night before Big Tech hearing (US Politics)

    Jump

  • Yep. There's money to be made here!

  • Microsoft endorses anti-LGBTQ online "child safety" bill KOSA night before Big Tech hearing (US Politics)

    Jump

  • Great point. Mike Masnick has said that he wouldn't be surprised if Meta also comes out in support, for similar reasons.

  • Microsoft endorses anti-LGBTQ online "child safety" bill KOSA night before Big Tech hearing (US Politics)

    Jump

  • Totally agreed that it opens things up to censorship in general and doesn't actually make kids safer. Charlie Jane Anders' The Internet Is About to Get A Lot Worse sets it in the context of book banning. The LGBTQ part is in the headlines because one big focus of the advocacy against it is highlighting that Democrats who claim to be pro-LGBTQ should not be backing this bill. This has been effective enough that Senators Cantwell and Markey both mentioned it in the committee markup, although it's certainly far from the only problem with the bill.

    Sec. 11 (b): Enforcement By State Attorneys General covers this. It's hard to find -- the bill text starts out with all the text removed from the previous amendment, and if you click on the "enforcement" link in the new table of context it takes you to the old struck-out text. It's almost like they want to make it as hard as possible for people to figure out what's going on!

  • Microsoft endorses anti-LGBTQ online "child safety" bill KOSA night before Big Tech hearing (US Politics)

    Jump

  • They get to position themselves as looking out for the children.